The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article: Hidden Dimensions - Another Christmas Arrives, Same Old Apple TV

 
The Postulant Photographer - Hardware

by
March 14th, 2007

In the first article of this series I talked about things you might consider when deciding on whether or not to step up to a digital SLR (DSLR). I'm going to assume that you have considered some or all of my advice and that you've either bought your new picture taking baby, or you are seriously eyeballing one or two, trying to decide which one to go with.

Whether you to step up to a DSLR or decide to use one of the increasingly capable consumer cameras, one thing should be very clear to you; they don't call it 'digital photography' for nothing. Your camera turns those beautiful sunsets, crunched fenders, and chubby-cheeked smiles into a bunch of ones and zeros, which, in turn, can be manipulated like no film photo ever could.

To work this digital magic you'll need the tools of the trade; a computer and printer or print service. You'll also need post processing software, but we'll talk about that in the next installment.

Before we get into the meat of this installment I'd like to correct an oversight pointed out to me by some of you who read the first article. I didn't go into one of the most important benefits of buying a DSLR: Higher quality photos.

I'm sure I'll get an argument on this, but the fact is, ounce for ounce, a DSLR is designed to give you higher resolution (the amount of detail distinguishable), lower noise (caused by the sensor that records your photo and can more easily seen in photos taken in poor light), and a broader dynamic range (the high and low limits of photographic data in which meaningful information can be had) than what a snap-shooter can give. All of these and other features combine in a DSLR to give you the opportunity to produce a better photo than you might with a snap-shooter given equal circumstances.

I emphasize "opportunity" in the above statement because no matter how good your equipment is, if you don't make use of the camera's features and the capabilities of your post processing equipment and software then the resulting photos from your thousand dollar DSLR won't look any better than they would if you'd used a camera that cost a hundred bucks.

Also, I believe that there is such a thing as the 'Photographer's Eye'; like a gardener's green thumb or the soul of a musician, the photographer's eye is something that can be enhanced, but it can't be taught. No one can tell you how they 'see' when they shoot photos. You can learn the mechanics of photography, and even learn to take a consistently decent shot, but the Eye is what sets the pros apart from the rest of us. So, even though you have a DSLR, your photos may never hang in a museum next to those of Ansel Adams, but you can learn to shoot well enough to feel good about hanging your pix in a gallery in your den, and that is a good thing.

So, let's jump right in, shall we?

Computers
It should go without saying that, if you are going to shoot digitally, then you will need a computer to load the images on to. (I guess I said it anyway.) Which computer to use is largely a question of what you have available and your preference.

I use Macs, I have for a long time and I'll likely continue to use Macs until someone comes up with a quantum computer that anticipates what I want and starts to work on my request a nanosecond before I hit the return key. (...and that computer will likely be a Mac.)


iMac Family

If you use a PC I won't hold it against you, PCs are capable and I've heard that many people swear by them (while others swear at them). Seriously though, no matter what you use for a computer make sure you have plenty of hard drive space. I suggest buying an external USB 2.0 or Firewire hard drive to store your photos on and to use as a backup for your other data (iTunes songs, email, etc)

Regardless of which type of computer you use, make sure you don't skimp on RAM. Trust me on this; your digital photography experience will be a lot more enjoyable if your computer isn't struggling to do what you ask of it, and RAM is the least expensive way to increase the performance of any computer.

How much RAM? The answer will vary depending on many factors, RAM prices and the depth of your wallet being prime among them. Also computers have limits to how much RAM they can hold. New iMacs and Mac minis, for instance, will accommodate 2 gigs (a euphemism for gigabytes) of RAM. I suggest that you buy as much as you can afford, and aim for at least get 1 gig of RAM.

Your computer and your patience will thank you.


Model T Ford taken at the Winter Park Auto Show, Winter Park, FL

Printers
Walk into any technology store (and even some supermarkets) and you'll likely find a vast array of printers each offering features you'll likely never use and claiming impressive specs.

Ignore the glitz and and geewhizardry, in fact, think about what it is you want out of a printer before shopping for one.

Don't know what you want out of a printer? Many folks don't. Let me suggest that you think about the following:

  • What will you print?
  • Do you want to print 5x7-inch photos, or do you also need to print the occasional document and maybe an 8x10-inch photo? There are many new printers designed specifically to print single size photos, typically 4x5-inch or 5x7-inch, quickly. There are other printers that will let you print panoramas as well as regular 8.5x11-inch or A4 size documents.

    Also, consider your other printing and document handling needs. Do you need to occasionally fax something, or scan in a photo or document? New all-in-one printer/fax/scanner/copier devices are becoming increasingly capable and reliable. However, if your primary goal is to print photos, then I'd concentrate on printers that emphasize that feature. Look for printers that can use enhanced inks: Some new printers using special inks and paper can print photos that will last 20 years or more.

  •  How often will you print (really)?
  • If you don't or won't use a printer very often then it doesn't make sense to spend a lot of money on an expensive, full featured printer. On the other hand, if you enjoy printing and giving out the photos you've taken, it might be wise to invest in a printer that makes the best possible prints. This is where those dedicated printers come in handy; they can push out nice gift size photos quickly and the paper is relatively inexpensive.

  • How much will it cost to print (per photo)?
  • This can be a big deal, and a hidden 'gotcha' in digital photography. Keeping a printer in ink cartridges and paper can be a pricey affair, especially if you intend to do a lot of printing. Don't be fooled by the cost of inexpensive printers, the ink cartridges for these may cost a third to half the cost of the printer, and you may have to change them often.

    Some printer makers will tell the approximate number of prints per cartridge. For instance, HP has a website that lists the approximate print cartridge yields for each printer it sells, and the cartridges ordering page shows approximate cost per print. Epson's site used to tell you the approximate number of photos per cartridge you can expect, but those links seem to have disappeared.  Canon, however, does list yields by printer

    Specs for ink cartridges should be readily available and I find it reprehensible that some printer makers won't make this information easy to find. I would suggest that you not buy a printer from a maker that won't give you cost per print info.

The point here is to investigate printers BEFORE you go out to the store. You'll save yourself a lot a time, money, and possible heartache in the long run.

An interesting thing to note: Kodak is releasing a series of printers where the ink cartridges are about half the cost of the cartridges for other printers. They also claim that the ink used in these new printers will create photos that last up to 100 years without fading. There is no way to validate Kodak's fade claim, but if inks cost half as much as the other guys then it might be a good idea to take a look.


Black-throated Sparrow, Tucson, AZ

Print Services
Printers are fine for most photographic needs, but when you really want your photos to look their best you should consider using a print service. Beyond your standard prints, these services offer a variety of enlargement options as well as specialty items like photo books, mugs, calendars, and tee shirts. The downside is that it can take several days for you to get your prints back.

Mac owners will be familiar with the Apple/Kodak printing service supported by iPhoto. It doesn't get any easier to order prints, and you can compose and order books of you photos as well, which can make treasured gifts.

PC users have Picasa (Windows XP only) which offers a list of print services to choose from. Again, it's easy to get the quality printing you want at reasonable rates.

Still, if you want professional quality printing you should consider a professional print service. You'll be surprise to know that pro print services don't cost much more than those that cater to the average consumer. In fact, they are often one in the same service. The difference is that the pro services offer more options. For instance, EZ Prints has a consumer page and a pro page. On the pro page you can get prints of panoramas up to an amazing 64-inches wide.

There are also printing services available at many local stores. For instance, OfficeMax offers printing and other services at very competitive prices. Also look into the photo centers at your corner drugstore or discount store, like Walgreens. The centers in these stores can give you prints up to 8x10-inches in just a few minutes and are inexpensive.

Finally, consider professional printers in your area. These folks cater to pros, but will often do special jobs for you, like printing on canvas and poster size enlargements. Be prepared to pay a little extra for their services, but what you get in return - excellent customer service, high quality, and attention to detail - is worth the extra cost.


On Ramp, Hwy 10, New Mexico

I currently use the Apple/Kodak service from iPhoto and EZ Prints. I also have an HP CP1700 printer and I will have prints made at my local OfficeMax if I need something done quickly and cheaply.

As you can see, the camera is only part of the equation, and we're not done yet. In my next article we'll talk about post-processing software, like PhotoShop and The Gimp.

I hope you've found this article informative and enjoyable. If you have questions or comments please post below or email me.

Until next time; happy shooting.

Vern Seward is a writer who currently lives in Orlando, FL. He's been a Mac fan since Atari Computers folded, but has worked with computers of nearly every type for 20 years.

Just a Thought Archives.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:Dirt Road Posts: 1239 Joined: 24 Oct 2002
Subject: Resolution vs. sharpness

DSLRs don't necessarily have high resolution (as measured in megapixels) than some consumer-cameras. But like the old Megahertz Myth of yore, it's a number that gets 'way too much emphasis. ("That camera must be better, it has more megapixels!")

For example, check out pictures on a major news site like the BBC. The photos they put up are tiny — 250x200 (50,000 pixels) in some cases — yet there's an incredible amount of detail to be seen. That's what a pro-level camera in the hands of a pro photographer is capable of. Not so much the number of pixels, but the amount of detail it can put into those pixels.

Learning how to use that capability… now there's the rub.

Close Name:BanjoBanker Posts: 86 Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Subject: Printing

I use a Nikin D70 for my photographs and I print them using an Epson R1800. The R1800 is a wonderful printer, uses 8 ink cartridges and can print up to 11x17. My wife uses it to print scrapbook pages. You make an excellent point about professional printing services. I have an account with Adorama and use them for paying jobs. I shoot children's birthday parties, and when I show them "proofs" from my R1800, which are excellent, the clients are really pleased. When I take them the final prints, they are blown away. I have the color profile from my Nikon on file at Adorama, and that is THE difference in professinal printers; when they have the color profile from your camera, they print exactly what you send to them after post processing. I charge $300 to 500 for a birthday party (approximately 3 hours,) so my clients expect the best, and I intend to deliver the best. The good part is the difference in cost is negliable, and I make money and the clients are happy.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: DSLR

One of the most important parts of a SLR (digital or film) is not part of the SLR body, but the glass you put in front of the medium, be that film or a digital sensor. If you buy a SLR bundle/kit and never change the lens you will never tap into the full capability. Unfortunately with DSLRs (and any digital camera) you are stuck with the medium it comes with, no switching to a better film.

Don't let them fool you; a zoom lens cannot replace every lens in your bag.

DSLRs also offer more control over the process with ISO, exposure time, and aperture (f/stop) control. While this isn't for everyone, some point and shoots don't offer all these controls, or expose them in such a way that is difficult to adjust.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Don't forget color calibration

Don't forget to mention that if you buy a printer, and want its colors to match the screen colors with any degree of accuracy, you'll have to calibrate them. For all the hassle of ink cartridges, printer cost, maintenance, and color correction, the services are an excellent deal. Even WalMart does a great job printing, although I use smugmug (which uses EZprints).

Close Name:VSeward -   TMO Staff Posts: 972 Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Don't forget color calibration

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
Don't forget to mention that if you buy a printer, and want its colors to match the screen colors with any degree of accuracy, you'll have to calibrate them. For all the hassle of ink cartridges, printer cost, maintenance, and color correction, the services are an excellent deal. Even WalMart does a great job printing, although I use smugmug (which uses EZprints).


You're right about Walmart, they have those Kodak kiosks and those big printers.

Here's my WalMart story: I shot a bucnh of photos of my neighbors daughters, one in her early teens, the other early 20s. The shot didn't go well, and the photos were dicey at best, but with some Photoshop magic I was able to pull out a few keepers and I wanted to get some quick prints to give to my models.

So I stopped at a local Walmart and got some 8"x10"s done of two shots that I liked.

I used the kiosk and had no problem, the results looked nice, so I took them to the counter to pay for them. The girl behind the counter looks at my prints, then at me and says, "These look professionally done."

I said, "Why, thank you!"

"Are you a professional photographer?"

"Ummm, no, it's a hobby," I said. Now, I'm wondering what's going on.

She looks at the photos again, then at me, then says, "Hold on."

She ducks back to where some other slightly older kid is working. The two huddle conspiratorially, whispering, then the senior counter person comes over and asks, "Do you have a business card?"

"No. What's this about? I just want to pay for my photos."

"Well, they look like they were shot by a professional."

"We've established that and I've thanked her already."

"Can you prove that you took them?"

"Excuse me?"

"Can you prove that you took these photos?"

"No more than this lady can prove she took her photos," I said pointing to the woman standing next to me listening to this exchange.

"Well," the senior countergirl says, "I can't sell them to you."

"WHAT? WHY?"

"Because you could have taken them off the Internet or something and we can't sell stolen copies."

I was livid.

I argued with this person for another minute then told her to keep them (and to place them where the sun don't shine). I then went to another WalMart, printed the same photos, and paid for them without incident.


I don't use Walmart anymore.

Vern Seward

Close Name:dhp Posts: 181 Joined: 22 May 2003
Subject: Two things

I have been using the same Epson SC 740 inkjet printer since 1999. It's pretty crappy by today's standards, but every time I look into getting a new inkjet I see all the complaints about ink--not just cartridge cost, but issues with ink drying up if you don't print enough. (Like many people, I mostly use a monochrome laser.)

I'm now using Snapfish to order photos and pick them up at Walgreen's within a couple of hours. It would take a lot of snapshots to equal the cost of a new inkjet, plus they look better, are waterproof, and will most likely last a lot longer. The only reason I would want a new printer is for CD and DVD printing.

I agree with the guest poster that lenses are the thing that often get overlooked. I was happy with my Canon DSLR with the kit lens, but then I got a prime (non-zoom) Canon 50mm F1.8. It's super cheap for a lens (about $75) but it's fast, meaning it can take in a lot of light, making a flash unnecessary in many situations. Photos come out so much better without the frontal onslaught of a built-in flash.

Everyone who has a Canon DSLR should have this lens (unless you can afford the heftier and even faster F 1.4 version for another $400 or so).

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Not a cactus wren

The photo you've labeled as a cactus wren is a black-throated sparrow.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

African or European?

Close Name:VSeward -   TMO Staff Posts: 972 Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Not a Cactus Wren

I will admit, it does look more like the black-throated sparrow than the cactus wren. They both have the eye-stripe and the dark throat, but the black-throated sparrow's throat is either solid black or brown, while the cactus wren's is a mottled brown.

The beaks are different too. Hmmm.

I think you are right.

Thanks!

Vern Seward

Close Name:computerbandgeek Posts: 52 Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
African or European?


LOL:D

Close Name:vansteen7 Posts: 1 Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Subject: Vern's generalization & Dirt Road's reply

Vern's generalizations about d-slrs vs snap shot cameras is exactly correct, as a generalzation. There are obvious possible exceptions depending on how you define 'd-slr' and 'shap shot'.

Dirt Road's observation is less accurate, I'm sorry to say. It implies that any camera capable of 72 dpi and compression encoding/decoding can provide high quality images under any circumstances. This is obviously not correct.

It DOES lead us (me at least) to discuss two real problems though: (1) the difference between the quality of the recorded file and the requirements for the application using the information in that file to disply the data as output. (2) the use of a single specific (and accurate) data to refute a generalization (which comparison, in this case, is even not an accurate comparison in it's relevance to the generaliztion Vern made) which was about recording data capabilities of two classes of cameras..

In ONE case (on screen display), Dirt is correct. In almost ALL others, Dirt is NOT correct. IF the data had not be recorded in the original capture file (and under the constraits Vern describes) THEN the reduced display requirements of the display media (on screen) would not be able to show the detail Dirt describes).

My reason for posting this is NOT to make Dirt wrong or to flame him. ( I had to go back and read it twice to find what concerned me about it.) It is to point out that using a specific to refute a generalzation is often misleading to some number of readers. The fact of the detail in the images on the BBC site is NOT an accurate argument to refute Vern's generalization.

Sorry for the obtuse post.
John

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Friday, November 21st, 2008

Fri., 2:40 PM
Mac Gaming News - Puzzle Adventure Game Book of Legends Comes to the Mac
2:20 PM
TMO's DealsOnTheWeb.com - Philips 8.5" Widescreen Portable DVD Player With iPod Dock: $129.99 Delivered
12:05 PM
The Simplified Guide to Buying a New HDTV System
10:20 AM
PopChar X 4.1.1 Improves FreeHand 10 Support
9:35 AM
iPodObserver - Apple Rolls out iPod touch Software 2.2 with Podcast Downloads
8:55 AM
New Mac Malware Surfaces
8:35 AM
Apple Releases Pro Applications Update 2008-004
8:00 AM
iPO Review - Clusterball Arcade
7:35 AM
iPodObserver - iTunes 8.0.2 Improves VoiceOver, More
6:55 AM
iPodObserver - iPhone Software 2.2 Adds Google Street View, Podcast Downloads
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • Special Report: iPhone
  • __________
  • Help TMO Grow
  • Macworld Expo - Hotel Deal
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $79.78. Change Today: -0.71.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb